Dartblog
Special Feature: Give a Rouse
Whither the College on the Hill? Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large, including deep coverage of the maturing tenure of Dr. Kim.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« MTA Service Alert | Home | The Mind of The New York Times »
“But he’s not a Democrat. We’re cleaning the Democratic Party out.”
Kos, of the Daily Kos, gave an address at the recent Kos Convention. In one quip, pulled by John Hinderaker, you really come to understand the puffed up shadow of the Cottage Kos industry. When a reporter noted aloud the Kos Committee’s lack of electoral success—embodied now in Senator Joe Lieberman—Kos responded from his Hyatt Regency lectern: “Yeah, but he’s not a Democrat. [See,] we’re cleaning the Democratic Party out.” I add the part in brackets so that you can understand the self-regarding yipping lilt Kos used in answering the question. Um, Mr. Reporter, you don’t seem to understand who we are. See, we’re the people. And, um, we’re cleaning the party. OK? It’s a blog revolution, maybe you’ve heard of it. Your little criticism there, about Lamont, just fits in with our plan. That’s exactly what we wanted, was to lose. Doy.
Kos, in other words, is abluting the Democrats of centrist men like Joe Lieberman. Then feting it at the Hyatt.
So, to be terribly clear about the success of the Kos Cabal four years into its march: 1) They aren’t winning elections, 2) They have proved unable to raise significant capital, 3) Their credibility with the public is negative or nonexistent, 4) They have no effect on the opposition party, 5) They have no material effect on their own party, 6) But they can occasionally squeeze moderates out of their own party by being one more pin among many needling the Democratic Party toward the left.
There are those who truly believe that the national Dems lay prone in Kos’s marriage bed. I just don’t see it. It is true that all the Democrats came to his Kosvention at the Hyatt Regency. But that was primarily so that they wouldn’t be seen as rejecting People Power, which presently happens to be represented by the noisome word “netroots.” It was not because they intend to care one whit what those people actually think.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…