Welcome to Dartmouth's most influential daily
Each day, Dartblog and its team of alumni and students bring you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large. Read our iPhone edition here.
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
Five in a Row.
T.J. Rodgers, Todd Zywicki, Peter Robinson, the constitution, and now Stephen F. Smith.
Dartmouth’s Board of Trustees will be joined by a fourth petition Trustee. Stephen F. Smith ‘88 has won the latest election, with 9,984 votes. 55% of voting alumni cast a vote for Mr. Smith. This makes him the most successful petition Trustee candidate in Dartmouth history. T.J. Rodgers ‘70 previously had that record, earning 8,025 votes in his 2004 election and the support of 54% of voting alumni.
Turnout in this Trustee election was the largest in recent history—28% of alumni filled out a ballot, compared to roughly 25% when Rodgers, Robinson, and Zywicki were elected. And the proportion of voters casting a vote for a petition candidate increased as well; Stephen Smith’s share of the vote was larger than any of the three other petition Trustees.
Stephen Smith ran against three officially nominated candidates: Richard “Sandy” Alderson ‘69, Sherri Oberg ‘82, and John Wolf ‘70. His principal opponent was Mr. Alderson, who to the dismay of many alumni ran a campaign premised on preventing a “hijack[ing]” of Dartmouth’s Board by Mr. Smith. Mr. Alderson sent out photo postcards in support of his candidacy. The columnist George Will, a friend of Mr. Alderson’s, endorsed him. William F. Buckley endorsed Stephen Smith later in the race.
For his part, Mr. Smith mailed two letters to the alumni body—one several months ago seeking petitions and another during balloting; that latter was a detailed four-page document laying out his platform. It can be read with footnotes here.
Mr. Wolf and Ms. Oberg engaged in minimal campaigning.
I was pleased as punch to endorse Mr. Smith in this post. Dartblog also wrote extensively against last year’s controversial constitutional overhaul, which, had it passed, would have changed the election rules to severely impair petition candidates. In the event, the constitution failed to pass by eighteen points and the 2007 Trustee election was conducted pursuant to the traditional rules.
UPDATE: Dartmouth’s official press release is here.
UPDATE: A. S. Erickson at The Dartmouth Review posts some thoughts.
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…