Dartblog
Special Feature: In Pursuit of a New President
The College is on the hunt for its seventeenth president after James Wright announced his June 2009 resignation. A search committee has been formed; its antecedental task is the resolution of this question: is this a time for steady-as-she-goes, or is there a mandate for fresh leadership? Updates here.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« “Is this really how they talk at the BBC these days?” | Home | An Epitaph for the West »
The earliest use that the researchers at the Oxford English Dictionary can find for ‘ho’—the word used by soon-to-be-former radio personality Donald Imus in reference to the utterly fantastic Rutgers girls basketball team—is from 1992. The 1992 usage comes from the lovely tune Treat Her Like Prostitute, which goes: “Now your girl she don’t like to have sex a lot And today she’s ready and she’s hot hot hot… Next thing you know the ho starts to ill She says, ‘I love you, Harold’ and your name is Will.”
And they say romance is lost. To recapitulate, we’ve learned that a word was invented just ten years ago by a crew of rappers. The word was formulated, perversely, to have a hint of disparagement, and yet to remain a common term of reference for any woman. (This is the first definition noted by Oxford, and the one Imus used: “Sometimes with weakened force,” the OED says, ‘ho’ means very simply “a woman.”)
And that awful use of the word has indeed persisted. It is used daily by Americans of a certain generation, and in saturation by rappers, hip-hop artists, and corrupt ovoid activists who long ago lost any claim to the public regard and who have done nothing to aid their constituencies but instead pass the time self-aggrandizing by stirring up senseless scandal and making themselves the supreme judges of the sensibilities of an entire race, and who moreover claim to be the final lexicographers of the English language.
Oh, here’s one of them now:
![]()
An aging radio personality awoke from his nap long enough to brush up on this new lexicon, and repeated it on the air. He was far off-base, because he knew that the language he was using was designed to be disparaging. The Rutgers gals are above that; deserve more. But he used it anyway and, as an e-mailer writes, “deserves whatever social and professional consequences come from this.”
What’s irksome about it is not the flack Imus is getting but the demagoguery from the likes of Sharpton, Clinton, and Obama.
UPDATE: An e-mail says that The Tuck Profit is also covering the issue.
ONCE MORE: Now Al Sharpton is vowing a push for actual broadcast censorship: “It is our feeling that this is only the beginning. We must have a broad discussion on what is permitted and not permitted in terms the airwaves.” One wonders if Sharpton will allow the “discussion” to go any way but his.
UPDATE: Alex Pareene pretty much reflects my thoughts: “Here’s a tip: no one here at Wonkette liked Don Imus even before he said that thing that wasn’t really any worse than countless other things he’s said before but that got picked up and made into a scandal because, well, we were overdue for a hysterical discussion of racism or something.”
But do read the hilarious e-mails he’s been getting.
Featured posts
Dartblog Specials
- The Dartmouth College Case
- 2007 Trustee Election
- Dartmouth Constitution
- Sunday Morning Sinatra
- The Indian Wars
Donate
Please note
This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.
All content appearing at Dartblog.com should be presumed copyright 2004-2008 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.
Advertisement
Subscribe by Email
adminCalendar
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 |
Archives
Search
Links
- //Drudge Report
- //AP News
- //Fox News
- //Reuters News
- ABC's The Note
- Andrew Marcus
- Agenda Gap
- Alex Ross
- And Rightly So
- Ann Althouse
- Armavirumque
- The Anchoress
- Audio Review
- Belgian Prince
- Brad Plumer
- Brussels Journal
- Buzzmachine
- CENTCOM
- Classical Values
- Conservative Thinking
- The Corner
- Craig Sanders
- Coyote Blog
- DartWire
- DartmouthBiz
- Dartmouth Observer
- Dartmouth Review
- Dartmouth Student Assemblog
- Democracy Project
- Different River
- Drew Cline
- Emmett Hogan
- Engadget
- Everyman
- Fresh Politics
- GOP Bloggers
- Hanover Collaboration
- Hatemonger's Quarterly
- Hispanic Pundit
- Hugh Hewitt
- Instapundit
- Iraq the Model
- Jacob Laksin
- Jeff Harrell
- Jen Krimm
- Language Log
- Lawrence Lessig
- Little Green Footballs
- Maggie's Farm
- Marginal Utility
- Matt Nolan
- Maroon Blog
- MN Publius
- McSweeney's
- No Oil for Pacifists
- New Hampshire Green
- New York Radio
- Oh, That Liberal Media
- Old Traditions
- Opinio Juris
- Opinion Journal
- Overheard at Dartmouth
- Pax Plena
- Power Line
- Paul Sand
- RealClearPolitics
- Rick Lee
- Right Side of the Rainbow
- Robert Hansen
- Roger L. Simon
- Samizdata
- Scott Adams
- Scott Burgess
- SCOTUS Blog
- SCSU Scholars
- Super Dartmouth
- TalkLeft
- Terry Teachout
- The MI Guy
- The Moderate Voice
- NRO's The Corner
- NRO's Phi Beta Cons
- Press Gaggle
- The Vatican of Liberalism
- TigerHawk
- Trey Jackson
- The Underside of Paradise
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Vital Perspective
- Vox Baby
- The Wayward Episcopalian
- WSJ - Washington Wire
- Weekend Pundit
- Wizbang Blog
- Wonkette
- Yale Free Press