Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« Davos Wrap-up | Home | Sunday Morning Sinatra - Taking a Trip »

Pinch to get pinched?

It should come as no surprise that one of the most affluent, thoroughly elitist, most devoutly patriarchal organization in Manhattan is The New York Times Company. (And, to shareholders, it comes as no surprise that the company’s strict anti-meritocracy does no aid to its grim financial situation.) The Times’ Château de Versailles business ethos comports pleasantly with its politics, of course: Keep control within the family; they’re the elites; they know what’s best for the rest.

Hassan Elmasry, a renegade director at Morgan Stanley—where the Sulzbergers have holed away many hundreds of millions of dollars—is trying to mount a decapitation attack ‘gainst Arthur Sulzberger Jr., current chairman.

Elmasry is in charge of Morgan Stanley’s American and Global Franchise Strategies Portfolio, an $11.5 billion investment fund that owns about 7.6 percent of the Times’ nonvoting shares. The stock, now around $24, is down nearly 40 percent over the past two years. His response: a proposal that the company eliminate its dual shareholder structure, which he believes fails to provide adequate oversight of management. […]

[T]he New York Times Co. (Charts) has both class A and class B shares. The A shares trade on the open market; the Times B shares are solely owned by Ochs-Sulzberger family members. They control the board through ownership of these B shares…

Isn’t that something? Call John Edwards, because there are two classes of New York Times shareholders.

In response to the attempted reform, Sulzberger has decreed that no further business shall be transacted with Morgan Stanley.

Featured posts

  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
  • August 23, 2009
    Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
    And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
  • May 31, 2009
    Kangaroo Court, Indeed
    In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at should be presumed copyright 2004-2014 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.




June 2012
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30