Dartblog
Special Feature: Give a Rouse
Whither the College on the Hill? Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large, including deep coverage of the maturing tenure of Dr. Kim.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« Sowell, Back to Basics | Home | The Chorus Facing Mike Nifong »
One of those revealing ledes
The newswriting industry, as you might imagine, has a special cant. One word in the vocabulary is lede, which is written in the lower case but is an acronym for ‘live end; dead end’. It is a way of referring to the meat of a news story. By almost all style books, the lede is supposed to be the very first paragraph of a wire report.
So here is an interesting lede, from a reporter called Andrew Hammond, writing for the wire service mockingly and often deservingly called al-Reuters. Hammond’s story, “Arab media shows sharp divides over Saddam and U.S.,” moved on the Reuters wire at 11:08 this morning. Here is how the story begins.
RIYADH (Reuters) - Arab media coverage of Saddam Hussein’s execution has reflected sharp divisions between Arabs opposed to U.S. influence in the region and those allied with Washington.Arab men and women who are pleased that Saddam Hussein has been killed—a majority, by any measure—and who are not actually American operatives have been entirely forgot.
The last section of the sentence represents what is called a false dichotomy. In this instance, it is a fallaciously false dichotomy, since any seasoned Middle East reporter has at least the intelligence to understand its inaccuracy and the certain political argument made there.
To repeat the offending assertion: The Arab world is divided into two sets—a set opposed to United States influence in Arab nations and a complementary set composed of “those allied with Washington.” According to this exceedingly convenient framing, Arab states and their people are either independent-minded sovereigns or acolytes of Washington, D.C. Which do you suppose Hammond favors?
Under this false dichotomy, America can never win. Either we successfully convert the Arab street into political allies (an impossibility, most will confess), or Arabs elect to be independent. That latter is a certainty. In point of fact, a successful pro-democratic American foreign policy would preserve and indeed honor Arab independence, and wouldn’t demand political alliance from these fresh democracies—and similarly would not demand that they start playing golf and listening to Britney Spears. The notion that liberal democratic government opens the floodgates of American culture and binds new liberal democracies to partnership with the United States is employed by freedom’s enemies with great profit. Those who choose to employ it owe Reuters reporter Andrew Hammond a debt.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…