Dartblog
Special Feature: The rent's unpaid, dear.
Fiscal infelicity, two (or more) open trustee seats, a deep endowment draw in a rough market. Not to mention the Second Dartmouth College Case. Jim Kim & Co. have a lot to contemplate. Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« May I Boast, For Just a Few Moments, about my swell new amp? | Home | At Duke, Professors cum Prosecutors »
Lacking the White House, Democrats Appeal to Syria, North Korea, and Egypt
Part of what makes our modern America a less than fully effective world power is the fact that a goodly percentage of the members of one of our two major parties do not believe America ought to be a world power. It isn’t that these people are subversive-minded, or that they are enemy spies. Rather, their internal moral code reads suspiciously like the Charter of the United Nations—they believe the advancement of national interests in international fora is simply wrong. It now appears that politicians with these beliefs, having just captured Congress, have decided to play the role of president as well.
Count among this set Democrat Senator Bill Nelson, who recently sojourned to Damascus to meet with a man called Bashar Assad over the objection of the State Department. Assad is what we acolytes of Webster would call an Enemy of the United States of America. As president of Syria, Assad is aiding and abetting the Islamist terrorists whom we fight in Iraq.
And now, two more. John Kerry flies to Egypt, another undemocratic state plagued by terrorism, to criticize the President and the policies of the United States. Kerry met Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. (Whom he did not criticize.) He and Mubarak discussed both Iraq and the issue of Israel and the group of people known as Palestinians. Kerry slammed the President, endorsed the worst recommendations from the Baker report (namely that we negotiate with Iran and Syria) and generally sashayed about planting his far-left seeds of a seperate peace. Is it any surprise the Israel-Palestine negotiations aren’t farther along, when a band of American radicals expecting to soon control the White House fly to the countries with whom we are negotiating and virtually guarantee a sweeter deal if only they will hold off for a few months?
So Nelson meets in Syria. Kerry in Egypt. And Governor Bill Richardson, a strong contender for the Democratic nomination for president? To the lovely and exotic Democratic People’s Republic of Korea goes he, a state known in more sober quarters as North Korea, Kim Jong-il’s nuclear funhouse. Richardson will discuss nuclear disarmament with the country that has spent the better part of a decade jerking us around on just that score.
There are occasions when renegade diplomacy works. Consider Ronald Reagan, who, tired and exasperated, once ended a day of wending and complex negotations at Reykjav’k by proposing to Gorbachev that each nation simply reduce its nuclear arsenal by half. Simple, clean, bold. Gorbachev agreed.
But Kerry, Nelson, and Richardson are not Ronald Reagan. They haven’t the talent but, more importantly, they are not the chief executive of the United States; nor has that executive invested them with plenipotentiary powers. This makes their negotiations with our enemies intensely dangerous, reckless, and grounds for the instant and prejudiced rejection of any of their bids for the White House in 2008.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…