Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« One Laptop Per Child Takes Flight | Home | When an economist watches a “refinance now!” infomercial »

In Letter to James Wright, UND President Kupchella Defends Sioux Name; Condemns ‘ignorance’ and ‘deflection’ at Dartmouth

undltrthumb1.gifIn a letter to Dartmouth President James Wright dated November 30, 2006, Charles Kupchella, the president of the University of North Dakota, defends his school’s team name, the Fighting Sioux, against attacks by Dartmouth Athletic Director Josie Harper and others, which many have seen as presumptuous and elitist.

In a rash of politically correct responses on the part of the Dartmouth administration to a list of grievances printed in The Dartmouth several weeks ago by a Dartmouth Native American group, Athletic Director Josie Harper apologized to Dartmouth’s American Indian students for inviting the University of North Dakota—whose Fighting Sioux hockey team is highly ranked—to the Ledyard Invitational tournament this year. The apology was widely covered in the media, seemingly vaulting Dartmouth to the top of the political correctness ranks for what appears to be a new policy of not playing any teams whose mascots might be deemed offensive by any segment of students.

The American Indian group’s list of “racist” incidents included, in full: 1) The crew team’s “Cowboys and Indians”-themed party, 2) Old-style t-shirts distributed by The Dartmouth Review, depicting Dartmouth’s former mascot, the Indian, 3) Similar t-shirts for sale outside a football game against College of the Holy Cross, which depicted that team’s mascot, the Crusader, fellating Dartmouth’s former mascot, the Indian, 4) A promotional mailing sent by Dartmouth’s Development Office which contained a photograph of an alumus holding an Indian-head cane, which were popular as commencement trophies when the Indian was Dartmouth’s mascot, and 5) an unconfirmed event in which inebriated fraternity initiates interrupted an Indian drum circle.

Finally, listed as an “ongoing” racist incident, the American Indian group complained about a piece of artwork depicting Indian students at Dartmouth’s founding in a state of perceived ignorance. The artwork, in response to earlier protests, has been boarded up and shielded from sight. The American Indian group would now like it destroyed.

Pursuant to a media strategy distributed to members of the American Indian group and leaked to campus journalists, the group was able to attract media coverage of the events it deemed racist, widely fomenting the impression that Dartmouth is a racist college. Few media reports actually listed the grievances. Nonetheless, in response to the pressure, Dartmouth President James Wright, Dean of the College Dan Nelson, and Josie Harper responded in letters-to-the-editor and e-mails to the Dartmouth community.

In his letter to Wright, Kupchella seized on the public, though manufactured, impression that Dartmouth is inhospitable to American Indian students. “I must,” he writes, “express my great displeasure and dismay at what has appeared to many here to have been an attempt by some at Dartmouth, especially your athletic director, to deflect your problems onto the University of North Dakota.” Referencing Harper, Kupchella writes, “To have placed herself above the majority of Indian people and above the Spirit Lake Nation is nothing short of patronizing.”

Kupchella goes on to explain the widespread and continuing support among North Dakota’s American Indian population for the Fighting Sioux name.

President Wright, to my knowledge, has not issued a response.

Read the entire letter in PDF format here.


Featured posts

  • August 14, 2013
    Breaking: Of Crips and Bloods and Memories of Ghetto Parties
    History repeats itself, first as tragedy and then as farce, or sometimes it just repeats itself. From the New York Times on November 30, 1998: At Dartmouth College, white students at a ”ghetto party” dressed…
  • June 25, 2013
    Dean of the College Charlotte Johnson’s War on Students Part (2/2)
    Part 1, Part 2 Today’s post again recounts the events that befell the Freshman. However, the content of the Hanover Police department report reproduced in this space yesterday is supplemented by information from my own…
  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at should be presumed copyright 2004-2018 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.




April 2018
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30