Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« “Written by Freddie Whilst Languishing In A Bubble Bath At The Munich Hilton Hotel” | Home | “Inexorable Command” »

The Folly of Borda’s Rule, and Giving Approval

Borda’s Rule: With N candidates, your 1st ranked candidate receives N-1 points from you. Your 2nd ranked candidate receives N-2 points from you. And so on. Non-chosen candidates receive zero points. Iterate the tallying and come up with an eventual winner.

Eschewing Borda, the Institute of Management Sciences, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (otherwise and more popularly known as IEEE, bestowers of such forgettable numbernames as 1394, now known as Firewire; and 1284, now known as USB), the Mathematical Association of America, and the American Statistical Association all use “approval voting” (wherein each voter may cast single affirmative votes for as many candidates as desired) to elect their officers. Retired Dartmouth Professor (and longtime Sierra Club activist) Robert Norman is also a fan of approval voting.

Meanwhile, the only prominent use I could find of Borda is the baseball MVP election, as noted by Mike Ossipoff, who writes that Borda is actually a quite restrictive method. “Of course Borda wouldn’t be so bad if voters could choose how many candidates to rank,” he writes. “And, to add more freedom to the method, why shouldn’t a voter be able to give any point score to a candidate, instead of a rigid decreasing sequence?” But when this level of freedom is granted, the method is strategically identical to approval voting.

The February 12 “special meeting” of Dartmouth Alumni nears, where a vote (only those in Hanover on that Sunday may vote) will be taken that will make subsequent ratification of a proposed constitution (one which changes from approval to instant-runoff voting) easier. A letter from approval voting supporter Joe Asch went out to the drafters of that constitution this morning, who strongly support instant-runoff voting. This debate is significant because it mirrors ones constantly being had nationally (with some ardent supporters of IRV) and within the Dartmouth studentry, which switched to IRV for the Student Assembly.

Included in the letter is this 1995 article [PDF] from the Journal of Economic Perspectives will convince. It was penned by Robert J. Weber, the Frederic E. Nemmers Distinguished Professor of Decision Sciences at Northwestern’s Kellogg School of Business. Even if you disagree with the hypothesis, Weber offers an enjoyable history of “new” voting methods.

However, what I would like to see is opposing scholarly work from game theorists, mathematicians, or statisticians in support of instant-runoff voting. None has yet been presented, so far as I know, to the Dartmouth community. It seems that this would do much to desteam people like me, who tend to see IRV advocacy as little more than change for change’s sake.


Featured posts

  • August 14, 2013
    Breaking: Of Crips and Bloods and Memories of Ghetto Parties
    History repeats itself, first as tragedy and then as farce, or sometimes it just repeats itself. From the New York Times on November 30, 1998: At Dartmouth College, white students at a ”ghetto party” dressed…
  • June 25, 2013
    Dean of the College Charlotte Johnson’s War on Students Part (2/2)
    Part 1, Part 2 Today’s post again recounts the events that befell the Freshman. However, the content of the Hanover Police department report reproduced in this space yesterday is supplemented by information from my own…
  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at should be presumed copyright 2004-2018 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.




March 2018
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31